After being subjected to Judith Bulter as a part of a Feminist Theory graduate class, I have come up with my own theory (on theory) and, well, I think it's a winner. Comments, questions, addition input...all welcome.
*Please note this is in no way meant to offend, it is all just a part of "coping through sarcasm" that I have found particularly usful in reading and discussing Judith Butler*
A Theory on Theory
There is a misapprehension in parts of the academic community that theory may be proliferated beyond the binary frame of "academic" and "student" depending on the manner in which one writes. It must be understood, however, that where there is a theorist who postulates and articulates and thereby produces a form of discourse with the intent of legitimizing one's utterance by a systematic deconstructualization of the actual or previously imagined intelligence of another, there is first a deeply rooted sadomasochistic relationship between aforementioned academic and student, without which the utterance would never be legitimized. Neither participant in the relationship is free to be that which they are, either academic (read: sadist) or student (read: masochist), outside of the context of the relationship and the standards to which they are upheld cannot be negotiated within the bounds of that relationship, nor can they be fully comprehended from the outside. Theory and the act of theorizing, therefore is not, to quote Judith Butler, a "product of choice, but the forcible citation of a norm, one whose complex historicity is indissociable from relations of discipline, regulation, punishment".
It must be noted that at the core of this relationship is the concept of asymmetrical reciprocity, whereby the academic, in the act of theorizing, establishes a sense of dominance in their field of choice, and the student, in being subjected to theory, 1) realizes their staus in the hierarchy of academia, the term peon come to mind first, 2) is granted the opportunity, through the persuit of acceptance in academia, to expand their knowledge base, which as previously mentioned could have been at an already exceptional level or previously imagined to be at that level, all in the hopes that through this subjectification they will one day dawn the title of "academic" and the cycle of theory can hence continue.
It must be noted that at the core of this relationship is the concept of asymmetrical reciprocity, whereby the academic, in the act of theorizing, establishes a sense of dominance in their field of choice, and the student, in being subjected to theory, 1) realizes their staus in the hierarchy of academia, the term peon come to mind first, 2) is granted the opportunity, through the persuit of acceptance in academia, to expand their knowledge base, which as previously mentioned could have been at an already exceptional level or previously imagined to be at that level, all in the hopes that through this subjectification they will one day dawn the title of "academic" and the cycle of theory can hence continue.